Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/-éh₂

This Proto-Indo-European entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Indo-European

Etymology

  • From *-h₂.

    Suffix

    *-éh₂ n

    1. Creates collective nouns and mass nouns corresponding to thematic formations with accent on the suffix.

    Usage notes

    This collective noun suffix gave rise to the thematic neuter plural suffix in nuclear (i.e. non-Anatolian) Indo-European languages. In Anatolian itself, it is disputed whether nouns attested with this suffix are plural or collective in number.

    Derived terms

    • -i-eh₂
      • Balto-Slavic:
        • Proto-Slavic: *-ьja

    Suffix

    *(o)-éh₂ f

    1. Creates action nouns and abstract nouns.
      *bʰer- (to bear) + ‎*-éh₂ → ‎*bʰoréh₂ (carrying, burden)

    Inflection

    Thematic in *-eh₂
    singular
    nominative *(o)-éh₂
    genitive *(o)-éh₂s
    singular dual plural
    nominative *(o)-éh₂ *(o)-éh₂h₁(e) *(o)-éh₂es
    vocative *(o)-éh₂ *(o)-éh₂h₁(e) *(o)-éh₂es
    accusative *(o)-ā́m *(o)-éh₂h₁(e) *(o)-éh₂m̥s
    genitive *(o)-éh₂s *? *(o)-éh₂oHom
    ablative *(o)-éh₂s *? *(o)-éh₂mos, *(o)-éh₂bʰos
    dative *(o)-éh₂ey *? *(o)-éh₂mos, *(o)-éh₂bʰos
    locative *(o)-éh₂, *(o)-éh₂i *? *(o)-éh₂su
    instrumental *(o)-éh₂h₁ *? *(o)-éh₂mis, *(o)-éh₂bʰis

    Usage notes

    These o-grade feminine abstract nouns are known as τομή (tomḗ)-type nouns in Indo-Europeanist literature, and were typically derived from *(o)-ós nominals from *CeR- roots.

    Derived terms

    Descendants

    • Proto-Germanic: *-ō
    • Proto-Hellenic: *-ā́
      • Ancient Greek: -ᾱ́ (-ā́), (-ḗ)
    • Proto-Indo-Iranian: *-áH

    Suffix

    *(∅)-éh₂ f

    1. Creates action nouns and abstract nouns.
      *bʰewg- (to flee) + ‎*-éh₂ → ‎*bʰugéh₂ (flight)

    Inflection

    Thematic in *-eh₂
    singular
    nominative *(∅)-éh₂
    genitive *(∅)-éh₂s
    singular dual plural
    nominative *(∅)-éh₂ *(∅)-éh₂h₁(e) *(∅)-éh₂es
    vocative *(∅)-éh₂ *(∅)-éh₂h₁(e) *(∅)-éh₂es
    accusative *(∅)-ā́m *(∅)-éh₂h₁(e) *(∅)-éh₂m̥s
    genitive *(∅)-éh₂s *? *(∅)-éh₂oHom
    ablative *(∅)-éh₂s *? *(∅)-éh₂mos, *(∅)-éh₂bʰos
    dative *(∅)-éh₂ey *? *(∅)-éh₂mos, *(∅)-éh₂bʰos
    locative *(∅)-éh₂, *(∅)-éh₂i *? *(∅)-éh₂su
    instrumental *(∅)-éh₂h₁ *? *(∅)-éh₂mis, *(∅)-éh₂bʰis

    Usage notes

    These nouns are known as φυγή (phugḗ)-type nouns in Indo-Europeanist literature. They are mainly formed from verbal roots, generally of the shape *CeRT-.

    Derived terms

    Proto-Indo-European terms suffixed with *-éh₂ (zero-grade)