Monotonicity criterion
The monotonicity criterion is quite intuitive: if the derivative of a function (i.e. the slope) is positive, it goes up, if the derivative is negative, it goes down. Mathematically, if the derivative
of a differentiable function
is non-negative or (non-positive) on an interval
, then
is monotonically increasing (or decreasing) on
. If
is even strictly positive (or negative)
, then
is strictly monotonically increasing (or decreasing).
In the first case, even inversion of the statement is true: If a differentiable function is monotonically increasing on
, then
and if the function is monotonically decreasing on
, then then
. However, the inversion does not hold true in the strict case, monotone functions do not always have
or
. For instance,
is strictly monotone, but
.
Theorem (Monotonicity criterion for differentiable functions)
Let
be continuous and differentiable on
. Then, there is
on
monotonically increasing on ![{\displaystyle [a,b]}](../_assets_/eb734a37dd21ce173a46342d1cc64c92/9c4b788fc5c637e26ee98b45f89a5c08c85f7935.svg)
on
monotonically decreasing on ![{\displaystyle [a,b]}](../_assets_/eb734a37dd21ce173a46342d1cc64c92/9c4b788fc5c637e26ee98b45f89a5c08c85f7935.svg)
on
strictly monotonically increasing on ![{\displaystyle [a,b]}](../_assets_/eb734a37dd21ce173a46342d1cc64c92/9c4b788fc5c637e26ee98b45f89a5c08c85f7935.svg)
on
strictly monotonically decreasing on ![{\displaystyle [a,b]}](../_assets_/eb734a37dd21ce173a46342d1cc64c92/9c4b788fc5c637e26ee98b45f89a5c08c85f7935.svg)
Proof
The four directions "
" follow from the mean value theorem. The two directions "
" follow by differentiability of the function:
Proof (monotonicity criterion for differentiable functions)
We first show the four directions "
" and then the two "
".
1.
: From
on
we get that
in monotonically increasing on
.
Let
for all
and let
with
. We need to show
. By assumption,
is continuous on
and differentiable on
. By the mean-value theorem, there is a
with
By assumption,
, and hence
. Since
we have in the enumerator
. This is equivalent to
, i.e.
is monotonically increasing.
2.
: From
on
we get that
in monotonically decreasing on
.
Let
for all
and let
with
. We need to show
. By assumption,
is continuous on
and differentiable on
. By the mean-value theorem, there is a
with
Now,
, and hence
. Since
we have
. This is equivalent to
, i.e.
is monotonically decreasing.
3.
:
on
implies that
is strictly monotonically increasing on ![{\displaystyle [a,b]}](../_assets_/eb734a37dd21ce173a46342d1cc64c92/9c4b788fc5c637e26ee98b45f89a5c08c85f7935.svg)
We prove this by contradiction: Let
be not strictly monotonically increasing. That means, we have some
with
and
. We need to find a
with
. Now,
is continuous on
and differentiable on
. So by the mean value theorem, we can find a
with
Since
, the enumerator of the quotient is non-positive, and because of
the denominator is positive. Thus the whole fraction is non-positive, and therefore
.
4.
:
on
implies that
is strictly monotonically increasing on ![{\displaystyle [a,b]}](../_assets_/eb734a37dd21ce173a46342d1cc64c92/9c4b788fc5c637e26ee98b45f89a5c08c85f7935.svg)
Another proof by contradiction: Let
be not strictly monotonically decreasing. That means, we have some
with
and
. We need to find a
with
. Now,
is continuous on
and differentiable on
. So by the mean value theorem, we can find a
with
Since
, the enumerator of the quotient is non-positive, and because of
the denominator is positive. Thus the whole fraction is non-positive, and therefore
.
Now, the two directions "
" follow:
1.
:
being monotonically increasing on
implies
on 
Let
with
. By monotonicity,
. Further, let
with
. Then we have for the difference quotient
If
, then
. The enumerator and denominator of the difference quotient are thus non-negative, and so is the total quotient. Similarly in the case of
and
enumerator and denominator are non-positive. Thus the whole fraction is again non-negative. Now we form the differential quotient by taking the limit
. This limit exists because
is differentiable on
. Furthermore, the inequality remains valid because of the monotonicity rule for limit values. Thus we have
Since
and
have been arbitrary, we get
on all of
.
2.
:
being monotonically decreasing on
implies
on 
Let again
with
. By monotonicity,
. Further, let
with
. Then we have for the difference quotient
If
, then
and thus the total quotient is non-positive. An analogous statement holds in the case
and
. By forming the differential quotient we now obtain
Since
and
have been arbitrary, we get
on all of
.
Examples: monotonicity criterion
Quadratic and cubic functions
Example (Monotonicity of quadratic and cubic functions)
For the quadratic power function
there is
So
is strictly monotonically decreasing by the monotonicity criterion on
and strictly monotonically increasing on
.
For the cubic power function
there is
So by the monotonicity criterion,
is monotonically increasing on
and strictly monotonically increasing on
and
. The cubic power function
is even strictly monotonically increasing on all of
.
The fact that
with
is strictly monotonically increasing, although only
and not
, stems from its derivative being zero at only a single point (namely 0). In the end of this article, we will treat a criterion, which tells us when a function is strictly monotone, even if there is not everywhere
.
Question: Why is
strictly monotonically increasing on

?
Exponential and logarithm function
Question: What is the monotonicity behaviour of the logarithm function extended to

, i.e.

?
Trigonometric functions
Example (Monotonicity of the sine function)
For the sine function
there is
So for all
, the
is strictly monotonically increasing on the intervals
and strictly monotonically decreasing on the intervals
.
Question: Where does the cosine function

show monotone behaviour?
Here,
.
So for all
, the
is strictly monotonically increasing on the intervals
and strictly monotonically decreasing on the intervals
.
Example (Monotonicity of the tangent function)
For the tangent function
there is for all
:
Hence, for all
, the
is strictly monotonically increasing on the intervals
.
Question: Where does the cotangent function

show monotone behaviour?
Exercise
Monotonicity intervals and existence of a zero
Exercise (Monotonicity intervals and existence of a zero)
Where is the following polynomial function monotone?
Prove that
has exactly one zero.
Solution (Monotonicity intervals and existence of a zero)
Monotonicity intervals:
The function
is differentiable on all of
, with
So
According to the monotonicity criterion,
is strictly monotonically increasing on
and on
. Further,
According to the monotonicity criterion,
is strictly monotonically decreasing on
.
has exactly one zero:
For
, we have the following table of values:
Based on the monotonicity properties and the continuity of
that we have previously investigated, we can read off that:
- On
is
strictly monotonically increasing. Because of
there is
for all
.
- On
is
then strictly monotonically decreasing. So there is also
for all
.
- Subsequently
increases on
again strictly monotonically. Because of
and
, there must be an
with
by the mean value theorem. Because of the strict monotonicity of
on
, there cannot be any further zeros.
Necessary and sufficient criterion for strict monotonicity
Proof (Necessary and sufficient criterion for strict monotonicity)
From the monotonicity criterion we already know that
is monotonically increasing exactly when
. So we only have to show that
is strictly monotonically increasing exactly when the second condition is additionally fulfilled.
:
strictly monotonically increasing
the set of zeros of
does not contain an open interval.
We perform a proof by contradiction. In other words, we show: If the set of zeros of
contains an open interval,
is not strictly monotonically increasing. Assume there is
with
for all
. Then, by the mean value theorem there is a
with
So
. If now
, then since
is monotonically increasing, there is
So there is
for all
. Hence,
is not strictly monotonically increasing.
: the set of zeros of
does not contain an open interval
strictly monotonically increasing
We perform a proof by contradiction. In other words, we show: if
is monotonically, but not strictly monotonically increasing, then the zero set of
contains an open interval. Assume there is
with
with
. Because of the monotonicity of
there is
So
for all
. That means
is constant on
. Hence there is for all
:
so the set of zeros of
does contain an open interval and we get a contradiction.
Exercise:
is strictly monotonically increasing